1)To be successful in sport, some people think you have to be physically strong. Others say that mental strength is more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In today’s stressful behaviour, sports have an outstanding contribution to preserving a healthy and agile body. Many people say that being physically strong is essential, while numerous tend to increase mental energy. I have considered two aspects according to perception, and this upcoming essay will describe the importance of both strengths previously giving any final advice in this article.

On the one hand, society who consider mental toughness the most critical factor in sports might think that athlete can easily overcome their fears, pressure, and adversity during their career with robust mental health. And this helps them to stay focused and productive for an extended period. For instance, the key to a victory in chess is the need to play with mental ability and perseverance, and it is almost impossible to surpass Indian player Viswanathan Anand, who has set an unparalleled record in chess around the world.  If a player of this level is going through mental distress, he will never see victory in a mental game like chess. On the contrary, if an athlete is mentally weak when confronting stressful situations or competing with better ones than him, the contestant is likely to be distracted, leading him to failures. Thus, mental strength plays an imperative role in the success of international supports that required mental capabilities.

On the other hand, several communities think that physical fitness is preferable as compared to mental strength. Competitors should at least have equal physical force if they want to beat other competitors. For example, in weight-lifting competitions, contestants are divided into various groups according to their ability to hold weight. However, if competitors are lacking physical durability, they may have to face defeat. Hence, the physical ability to excel in physique related games is beneficial for goal achievement.

Lastly, from the above-mentioned prospects, I accord that to be successful, an athlete must have both physical and as well as mental abilities in playing sports, comprehensively. Therefore, either mental or physical strength is quite valuable as per the requirements for the country’s pride and honour.

2)Governments should spend money on railways than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Infrastructure development plays a vital role in the quality of life of citizens. It is thought by some that the government ought to invest more in rail networks than in road infrastructure. I entirely agree with this view from environmental and social perspectives.

Firstly, the investment in railways benefits the country by improving the environment. It is undeniable that the use of cars adversely affects the environment by releasing greenhouse gases and other harmful substances into the air. Trains, on the other hand, are relatively ecologically friendly as a number of people can be carried in a single carriage. For this reason, using more financial resources for improving rail networks would certainly be advantageous for the sustainability of the country. In Vietnam, for instance, the lack of efficient rail transport causes residents to drive vehicles, thereby exacerbating air pollution.

Another point to consider is the convenience that enhanced railways would bring. Some might argue that more organised roads would have a positive impact on citizens as they would be able to get around the city more easily by car. However, the development of roads would most likely create congestion due to the increased use of vehicles. Improved railway services, by contrast, would encourage more individuals to take the train, which would reduce the number of cars on the road. Therefore, the allocation of funds to railways would bring a social benefit to society. A good example is Tokyo, where inhabitants and tourists enjoy both convenient rail networks, such as subways, and less congested roads.

In conclusion, I strongly agree that the government should spend more money on building a better railway in terms of the environmental and social advantages it would give to society. It is crucial that each country strive to create an efficient transportation system.

نمونه های رایتینگ آیلتس 9​​

3)In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn. Discuss both sides of view and give your opinion.

In the present age, there has been much discussion revolving around the issue of whether the amout of salaries for some persons are extremely high in some countries. Many people believe that it is good for a nation, while others think that the government has a responsibility to control the earning outcomes of each individual. Personally, I am in favour of the latter view.

On the one hand, many people argue that everyone should earn higher salaries than others based on their work difficulties and strength. They firmly beileve that some jobs are quite harder and needs more energy or time. In addition, some careers need academic skills so people should spending many years in university and learn too much information. For instance, to being a medical doctor people need to study for a long period and after that, they will face many problematic days in their professional life because they have a heavy responsibility to save the people lives. Furthermore, if these kind of jobs have higher salaries, it will motivates young individuals to try more and become an useful person for their country.

On the other hand, others totally disagree with that statement and assert that the government should take some steps and make new policies to control the amount of incomes. This group think that if the amount of salaries be unbalanced, the rate of poverty will increase in society. Due to that, the state should adds new measures to tackle this situation and control the economy level of the country. For example, wealthy people should pay more tax compare to persons who are economically weaker. As a result, the nation will have a balanced economy and prevents increasing the poverty.

To sum up, I would like to conclude that I strongly agree with the statement that wealthier individuals have to help people who are not able to work like disabled persons by paying more tax.